<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tom Oreb Week!</title>
	<link>http://cartoonmodern.blogsome.com/2006/03/07/tom-oreb-week/</link>
	<description>The  official blog of the new Chronicle book  CARTOON MODERN: STYLE AND DESIGN IN FIFTIES ANIMATION.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://cartoonmodern.blogsome.com/2006/03/07/tom-oreb-week/#comment-524</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cartoonmodern.blogsome.com/2006/03/07/tom-oreb-week/#comment-524</guid>
					<description>I've always loved the animals in SB--but I think for me it has more to do with the overall appeal of the animation, design and color than any personality that's there(The Prince's terrific horse excepted).  Funny, I wouldn't agree with Ward that the Oreb designs are flatter or more graphic--rendering aside; to me they actually look &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; volumetric, more fat and sloppy--and that's part of the personality thing that I get from Oreb's bunny that's lost in the translation for me:  the original is goofy, dumb(somewhat), enthusiastic, a little left behind or mystified--and lazy.  The cleanup is perky, smart, friendly-perhaps just a bit too much one-note(keeping in mind I think they're beautiful drawings).  And maybe that's just what they wanted from the rabbit--and birds, etc.--in their few scenes; no more distinction of personality  than is seen in the cleanup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve always loved the animals in SB&#8211;but I think for me it has more to do with the overall appeal of the animation, design and color than any personality that&#8217;s there(The Prince&#8217;s terrific horse excepted).  Funny, I wouldn&#8217;t agree with Ward that the Oreb designs are flatter or more graphic&#8211;rendering aside; to me they actually look <i>more</i> volumetric, more fat and sloppy&#8211;and that&#8217;s part of the personality thing that I get from Oreb&#8217;s bunny that&#8217;s lost in the translation for me:  the original is goofy, dumb(somewhat), enthusiastic, a little left behind or mystified&#8211;and lazy.  The cleanup is perky, smart, friendly-perhaps just a bit too much one-note(keeping in mind I think they&#8217;re beautiful drawings).  And maybe that&#8217;s just what they wanted from the rabbit&#8211;and birds, etc.&#8211;in their few scenes; no more distinction of personality  than is seen in the cleanup.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://cartoonmodern.blogsome.com/2006/03/07/tom-oreb-week/#comment-515</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cartoonmodern.blogsome.com/2006/03/07/tom-oreb-week/#comment-515</guid>
					<description>awww.... Fluffy bunny! that rocks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>awww&#8230;. Fluffy bunny! that rocks
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ward</title>
		<link>http://cartoonmodern.blogsome.com/2006/03/07/tom-oreb-week/#comment-510</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cartoonmodern.blogsome.com/2006/03/07/tom-oreb-week/#comment-510</guid>
					<description>I can definitely tell that someone else took Oreb's rabbit designs and converted them into a more cuddlier and 3-dimensional bunny. I actually don't mind the look of the revised bunny -- Oreb's bunny is flater, more graphic in nature, which would've posed a problem for the animators working on the character. Animators tend to make flat characters more fleshed out and fuller and I think that whoever took his initial designs wanted a bunny that was softer than what Oreb had done, I'm guessing.  

When I created these characters for a show open a couple of years ago, I incorporated a very stylized and very FLAT look into their design. My assistants had a dickens of a time trying to &quot;get&quot; that look. It was very difficult for them to understand completely what I was intending when say, the arm was raised or when the character turned his head. They wanted to draw curves in places where I had never intended curves to be at all. I eventually took most of what they did and tweaked it to make it fit. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I can definitely tell that someone else took Oreb&#8217;s rabbit designs and converted them into a more cuddlier and 3-dimensional bunny. I actually don&#8217;t mind the look of the revised bunny &#8212; Oreb&#8217;s bunny is flater, more graphic in nature, which would&#8217;ve posed a problem for the animators working on the character. Animators tend to make flat characters more fleshed out and fuller and I think that whoever took his initial designs wanted a bunny that was softer than what Oreb had done, I&#8217;m guessing.  </p>
	<p>When I created these characters for a show open a couple of years ago, I incorporated a very stylized and very FLAT look into their design. My assistants had a dickens of a time trying to &#8220;get&#8221; that look. It was very difficult for them to understand completely what I was intending when say, the arm was raised or when the character turned his head. They wanted to draw curves in places where I had never intended curves to be at all. I eventually took most of what they did and tweaked it to make it fit.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: julie</title>
		<link>http://cartoonmodern.blogsome.com/2006/03/07/tom-oreb-week/#comment-508</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cartoonmodern.blogsome.com/2006/03/07/tom-oreb-week/#comment-508</guid>
					<description>awwww that's so so so cute!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>awwww that&#8217;s so so so cute!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
